Paper detail

Semantic Similarity Computing for Scientific Academic Conferences fused with domain features

Aiming at the problem that the current general-purpose semantic text similarity calculation methods are difficult to use the semantic information of scientific academic conference data, a semantic similarity calculation algorithm for scientific academic conferences by fusion with domain features is proposed. First, the domain feature information of the conference is obtained through entity recognition and keyword extraction, and it is input into the BERT network as a feature and the conference information. The structure of the Siamese network is used to solve the anisotropy problem of BERT. The output of the network is pooled and normalized, and finally the cosine similarity is used to calculate the similarity between the two sessions. Experimental results show that the SBFD algorithm has achieved good results on different data sets, and the Spearman correlation coefficient has a certain improvement compared with the comparison algorithm.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.