Paper detail

Self-similar orbit-averaged Fokker-Planck equation for isotropic spherical dense clusters (i) accurate pre-collapse solution

This is the first paper of a series of our works on the self-similar orbit-averaged Fokker-Planck (OAFP) equation for distribution function of stars in dense isotropic star clusters. At the late stage of relaxation evolution of the clusters, standard stellar dynamics predicts that the clusters evolve in a self-similar fashion forming collapsing cores. However, the corresponding mathematical model, the self-similar OAFP equation, has never been solved on the whole energy domain $(-1< E < 0)$. The existing works based on kinds of finite difference methods provide solutions only on the truncated domain $-1< E<-0.2$. To broaden the range of the truncated domain, the present work resorts to a (highly accurate and efficient) Gauss-Chebyshev pseudo-spectral method. We provide a spectral solution, whose number of significant figures is four, on the whole domain. Also, the solution can reduce to a semi-analytical form whose degree of polynomials is only eighteen holding three significant figures. We also provide the new eigenvalues; $c_{1}=9.0925\times10^{-4}$, $c_{2}=1.1118\times10^{-4}$, $c_{3}=7.1975\times10^{-2}$ and $c_{4}=3.303\times10^{-2}$, corresponding to the core collapse rate $ξ=3.64\times10^{-3}$, scaled escape energy $χ_\text{esc}=13.881$ and power-law exponent $α=2.2305$. Since the solution on the whole domain is unstable against degree of Chebyshev polynomials, we also provide spectral solutions on truncated domains ( $-1< E<E_\text{max}$, where $-0.35<E_\text{max}<-0.03$) to explain how to handle the instability. By reformulating the OAFP equation in several ways, we improve the accuracy of the spectral solution and reproduce an existing self-similar solution, which infers that existing solutions have only one significant figure at best.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.