Paper detail

Self-scaled bounds for atomic cone ranks: applications to nonnegative rank and cp-rank

The nonnegative rank of a matrix A is the smallest integer r such that A can be written as the sum of r rank-one nonnegative matrices. The nonnegative rank has received a lot of attention recently due to its application in optimization, probability and communication complexity. In this paper we study a class of atomic rank functions defined on a convex cone which generalize several notions of "positive" ranks such as nonnegative rank or cp-rank (for completely positive matrices). The main contribution of the paper is a new method to obtain lower bounds for such ranks which improve on previously known bounds. Additionally the bounds we propose can be computed by semidefinite programming. The idea of the lower bound relies on an atomic norm approach where the atoms are self-scaled according to the vector (or matrix, in the case of nonnegative rank) of interest. This results in a lower bound that is invariant under scaling and that is at least as good as other existing norm-based bounds. We mainly focus our attention on the two important cases of nonnegative rank and cp-rank where our bounds satisfying interesting properties: For the nonnegative rank we show that our lower bound can be interpreted as a non-combinatorial version of the fractional rectangle cover number, while the sum-of-squares relaxation is closely related to the Lovász theta number of the rectangle graph of the matrix. We also prove that the lower bound inherits many of the structural properties satisfied by the nonnegative rank such as invariance under diagonal scaling, subadditivity, etc. We also apply our method to obtain lower bounds on the cp-rank for completely positive matrices. In this case we prove that our lower bound is always greater than or equal the plain rank lower bound, and we show that it has interesting connections with combinatorial lower bounds based on edge-clique cover number.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.