Paper detail

Self-Organized Criticality in Stellar Flares

Power law size distributions are the hallmarks of nonlinear energy dissipation processes governed by self-organized criticality. Here we analyze 75 data sets of stellar flare size distributions, mostly obtained from the {\sl Extreme Ultra-Violet Explorer (EUVE)} and the {\sl Kepler} mission. We aim to answer the following questions for size distributions of stellar flares: (i) What are the values and uncertainties of power law slopes? (ii) Do power law slopes vary with time ? (iii) Do power law slopes depend on the stellar spectral type? (iv) Are they compatible with solar flares? (v) Are they consistent with self-organized criticality (SOC) models? We find that the observed size distributions of stellar flare fluences (or energies) exhibit power law slopes of $α_E=2.09\pm0.24$ for optical data sets observed with Kepler. The observed power law slopes do not show much time variability and do not depend on the stellar spectral type (M, K, G, F, A, Giants). In solar flares we find that background subtraction lowers the uncorrected value of $α_E=2.20\pm0.22$ to $α_E=1.57\pm0.19$. Furthermore, most of the stellar flares are temporally not resolved in low-cadence (30 min) Kepler data, which causes an additional bias. Taking these two biases into account, the stellar flare data sets are consistent with the theoretical prediction $N(x) \propto x^{-α_x}$ of self-organized criticality models, i.e., $α_E=1.5$. Thus, accurate power law fits require automated detection of the inertial range and background subtraction, which can be modeled with the generalized Pareto distribution, finite-system size effects, and extreme event outliers.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.