Paper detail

Self-gravitating equilibrium models of dwarf galaxies and the minimum mass for star formation

We construct a series of model galaxies in rotational equilibrium consisting of gas, stars, and a fixed dark matter (DM) halo and study how these equilibrium systems depend on the mass and form of the DM halo, gas temperature, non-thermal and rotation support against gravity, and also on the redshift of galaxy formation. For every model galaxy we find the minimum gas mass M_g^min required to achieve a state in which star formation (SF) is allowed according to contemporary SF criteria. The obtained M_g^min--M_DM relations are compared against the baryon-to-DM mass relation M_b--M_DM inferred from the \LambdaCDM theory and WMAP4 data. Our aim is to construct realistic initial models of dwarf galaxies (DGs), which take into account the gas self-gravity and can be used as a basis to study the dynamical and chemical evolution of DGs. Rotating equilibria are found by solving numerically the steady-state momentum equation for the gas component in the combined gravitational potential of gas, stars, and DM halo using a forward substitution procedure. We find that for a given M_DM the value of M_g^min depends crucially on the gas temperature T_g, gas spin parameter α, degree of non-thermal support σ_eff, and somewhat on the redshift for galaxy formation z_gf. Depending on the actual values of T_g, α, σ_eff, and z_gf, model galaxies may have M_g^min that are either greater or smaller than M_b. Galaxies with M_DM \ga 10^9 M_sun are usually characterized by M_g^min \la M_b, implying that SF in such objects is a natural outcome as the required gas mass is consistent with what is available according to the \LambdaCDM theory. On the other hand, models with M_DM \la 10^9 M_sun are often characterized by M_g^min >> M_b, implying that they need much more gas than available to achieve a state in which SF is allowed. Abridged.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.