Paper detail

Self-Enrichment in Globular Clusters: Is There a Role for the Super-Asymptotic Giant Branch Stars?

In four globular clusters (GCs) a non negligible fraction of stars can be interpreted only as a very helium rich population. The evidence comes from the presence of a "blue" main sequence in $ω$ Cen and NGC 2808, and from the the very peculiar horizontal branch morphology in NGC 6441 and NGC 6388. Although a general consensus is emerging on the fact that self--enrichment is a common feature among GCs, the helium content required for these stars is Y$\simgt$0.35, and it is difficult to understand how it can be produced without any --or, for $ω$ Cen, without a considerable--associated metal enhancement. We examine the possible role of super--AGB stars, and show that they may provide the required high helium. However, the ejecta of the most massive super--AGBs show a global CNO enrichment by a factor of $\simeq$4, due to the dredge--out process occurring at the second dredge up stage. If these clusters show no evidence for this CNO enrichment, we can rule out that at least the most massive super--AGBs evolve into O--Ne white dwarfs and take part in the formation of the second generation stars. This latter hypothesis may help to explain the high number of neutron stars present in GCs. The most massive super--AGBs would in fact evolve into electron--capture supernovae. Their envelopes would be easily ejected out of the cluster, but the remnant neutron stars remain into the clusters, thanks to their small supernova natal kicks.

preprint2008arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.