Paper detail

Self-consistent population spectral synthesis with FADO - I. The importance of nebular emission in modelling star-forming galaxies

Spectral population synthesis (PS) is a fundamental tool in extragalactic research that aims to decipher the assembly history of galaxies from their SED. However, until recently all PS codes were restricted to purely stellar fits, neglecting the essential contribution of nebular emission (NE). With the advent of FADO, the now possible self-consistent modelling of stellar and NE opens new routes to the exploration of galaxy SFHs. The main goal of this study is to quantitatively explore the accuracy to which FADO can recover physical and evolutionary properties of galaxies and compare its output with that from purely stellar PS codes. With this in mind, FADO and STARLIGHT were applied to synthetic SEDs that track the spectral evolution of stars and gas in extinction-free mock galaxies that form their stellar mass ($M_\star$) according to different parametric SFHs. Spectral fits were computed for two different set-ups that approximate the spectral range of SDSS and CALIFA data. Our analysis indicates that FADO can recover the key physical and evolutionary properties of galaxies, such as $M_\star$ and mass- and light-weighted mean age and metallicity, with an accuracy better than 0.2 dex. This is the case even in phases of strongly elevated sSFR and thus with considerable NE contamination. As for STARLIGHT, our analysis documents a moderately good agreement with theoretical values only for evolutionary phases for which NE drops to low levels. Indeed, fits with STARLIGHT during phases of high sSFR severely overestimate both $M_\star$ and the mass-weighted stellar age, whereas strongly underestimate the light-weighted age and metallicity. The insights from this study suggest that the neglect of nebular continuum emission in STARLIGHT and similar purely stellar PS codes could systematically impact $M_\star$ and SFH estimates for star-forming galaxies.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.