Paper detail

Self-consistent Modeling of the $I_c$ of HTS Devices: How Accurate do Models Really Need to Be?

Numerical models for computing the effective critical current of devices made of HTS tapes require the knowledge of the Jc(B,theta) dependence, i.e. of the way the critical current density Jc depends on the magnetic flux density B and its orientation theta with respect to the tape. In this paper we present a numerical model based on the critical state with angular field dependence of Jc to extract the Jc(B,theta) relation from experimental data. The model takes into account the self-field created by the tape, which gives an important contribution when the field applied in the experiments is low. The same model can also be used to compute the effective critical current of devices composed of electromagnetically interacting tapes. Three examples are considered here: two differently current rated Roebel cables composed of REBCO coated conductors and a power cable prototype composed of Bi-2223 tapes. The critical currents computed with the numerical model show good agreement with the measured ones. The simulations reveal also that several parameter sets in the Jc(B,theta) give an equally good representation of the experimental characterization of the tapes and that the measured Ic values of cables are subjected to the influence of experimental conditions, such as Ic degradation due to the manufacturing and assembling process and non-uniformity of the tape properties. These two aspects make the determination of a very precise Jc(B,theta) expression probably unnecessary, as long as that expression is able to reproduce the main features of the angular dependence. The easiness of use of this model, which can be straightforwardly implemented in finite-element programs able to solve static electromagnetic problems, is very attractive both for researchers and devices manufactures who want to characterize superconducting tapes and calculate the effective critical current of superconducting devices.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.