Paper detail

Self-calibration of Networks of Gravitational Wave Detectors

As LIGO and Virgo are upgraded, improving calibration systems to keep pace with the anticipated signal-to-noise enhancements will be challenging. We explore here a calibration method that uses astronomical signals, namely inspiral signals from compact-object binaries, and we show that it can in principle enable calibration at the sub-1\% accuracy levels needed for future gravitational wave science. We show how ensembles of these transient events can be used to measure the calibration errors of individual detectors in a network of three or more comparably sensitive instruments. As with telescopes, relative calibration of gravitational-wave detectors using detected events is easier to achieve than absolute calibration, which in principle would still need to be done with a hardware method for at least one detector at one frequency. Our proposed method uses the so-called null streams, the signal-free linear combinations of the outputs of the detectors that exist in any network with three or more differently oriented detectors. Signals do not appear in the null stream if the signal amplitude in the detector output is faithful to that of the real signal. Frequency-dependent calibration errors and relative calibration and timing errors between detectors leave a residual in the null stream. The amount of residual from each detector depends on the source direction. We adapt the method of matched filtering to the problem of extracting the calibration error of each detector from this residual. This requires combining linearly the filter outputs of a sufficient number of detected signals, and in principle it can achieve any desired accuracy in a long enough observation run. We anticipate that A+ detector networks, expected in 5 years, could employ this method to check anticipated hardware calibration accuracies.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.