Paper detail

Selectivity Trends and Role of Adsorbate-Adsorbate Interactions in CO Hydrogenation on Rhodium Catalysts

Predictive-quality computational modeling of heterogeneously catalyzed reactions has emerged as an important tool for the analysis and assessment of activity and activity trends. In contrast, more subtle selectivities and selectivity trends still pose a significant challenge to prevalent microkinetic modeling approaches that typically employ a mean-field approximation (MFA). Here, we focus on CO hydrogenation on Rh catalysts with the possible products methane, acetaldehyde, ethanol and water. This reaction has already been subject to a number of experimental and theoretical studies with conflicting views on the factors controlling activity and selectivity towards the more valuable higher oxygenates. Using accelerated first-principles kinetic Monte Carlo (KMC) simulations and explicitly and systematically accounting for adsorbate-adsorbate interactions through a cluster expansion approach, we model the reaction on the low-index Rh(111) and stepped Rh(211) surfaces. We find that the Rh(111) facet is selective towards methane, while the Rh(211) facet exhibits a similar selectivity towards methane and acetaldehyde. This is consistent with the experimental selectivity observed for larger, predominantly (111)-exposing Rh nanoparticles and resolves the discrepancy to earlier first-principles MFA microkinetic work that found the Rh(111) facet to be selective towards acetaldehyde. While the latter work tried to approximately account for lateral interactions through coverage-dependent rate expressions, our analysis demonstrates that this fails to sufficiently capture concomitant correlations among the adsorbed reaction intermediates that crucially determine the overall selectivity.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.