Paper detail

Selection of ULIRGs in Infrared and Submm Surveys

We examine the selection characteristics of infrared and sub-mm surveys with IRAS, Spitzer, BLAST, Herschel and SCUBA and identify the range of dust temperatures these surveys are sensitive to, for galaxies in the ULIRG luminosity range (12<log(LIR)<13), between z=0 and z=4. We find that the extent of the redshift range over which surveys are unbiased is a function of the wavelength of selection, flux density limit and ULIRG luminosity. Short wavelength (<200μm) surveys with IRAS, Spitzer/MIPS and Herschel/PACS are sensitive to all SED types in a large temperature interval (17-87K), over a substantial fraction of their accessible redshift range. On the other hand, long wavelength (>200μm) surveys with BLAST, Herschel/ SPIRE and SCUBA are significantly more sensitive to cold ULIRGs, disfavouring warmer SEDs even at low redshifts. We evaluate observations in the context of survey selection effects, finding that the lack of cold ULIRGs in the local (z<0.1) Universe is not a consequence of selection and that the range of ULIRG temperatures seen locally is only a subset of a much larger range which exists at high redshift. We demonstrate that the local luminosity-temperature (L-T) relation, which indicates that more luminous sources are also hotter, is not applicable in the distant Universe when extrapolated to the ULIRG regime, because the scatter in observed temperatures is too large. Finally, we show that the difference between the ULIRG temperature distributions locally and at high redshift is not the result of galaxies becoming colder due to an L-T relation which evolves as a function of redshift. Instead, they are consistent with a picture where the evolution of the infrared luminosity function is temperature dependent, i.e. cold galaxies evolve at a faster rate than their warm counterparts.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.