Paper detail

Selection maintaining protein stability at equilibrium

The common understanding of protein evolution has been that neutral or slightly deleterious mutations are fixed by random drift, and evolutionary rate is determined primarily by the proportion of neutral mutations. However, recent studies have revealed that highly expressed genes evolve slowly because of fitness costs due to misfolded proteins. Here we study selection maintaining protein stability. Protein fitness is taken to be $s = κ\exp(βΔG) (1 - \exp(βΔΔG))$, where $s$ and $ΔΔG$ are selective advantage and stability change of a mutant protein, $ΔG$ is the folding free energy of the wild-type protein, and $κ$ represents protein abundance and indispensability. The distribution of $ΔΔG$ is approximated to be a bi-Gaussian function, which represents structurally slightly- or highly-constrained sites. Also, the mean of the distribution is negatively proportional to $ΔG$. The evolution of this gene has an equilibrium ($ΔG_e$) of protein stability, the range of which is consistent with experimental values. The probability distribution of $K_a/K_s$, the ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous substitution rate per site, over fixed mutants in the vicinity of the equilibrium shows that nearly neutral selection is predominant only in low-abundant, non-essential proteins of $ΔG_e > -2.5$ kcal/mol. In the other proteins, positive selection on stabilizing mutations is significant to maintain protein stability at equilibrium as well as random drift on slightly negative mutations, although the average $\langle K_a/K_s \rangle$ is less than 1. Slow evolutionary rates can be caused by high protein abundance/indispensability, which produces positive shifts of $ΔΔG$ through decreasing $ΔG_e$, and by strong structural constraints, which directly make $ΔΔG$ more positive.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.