Paper detail

Seismic response of cylinder assemblies in axial flow

Earthquakes are a great challenge for the safety of nuclear reactors. To address this challenge, we need to better understand how the reactor core responds to seismic forcing. The reactor core is made of fuel assemblies, which are themselves composed of flexible fuel rods immersed in a strong axial flow. This gives rise to strongly-coupled fluid-structure interactions whose accurate modelling generally requires high computational costs. In this paper, we introduce a new model able to capture the mechanical response of the reactor core subjected to seismic forcing with low computational costs. This model is based on potential flow theory for the fluid part and Euler-Bernoulli beam theory for the structural part allowing us to predict the response to seismic forcing in presence of axial flow.. The linear equations are solved in the Fourier space to decrease computational time. For validation purposes, we first use the proposed model to compute the response of a single cylinder in axial flow. We then implement a multiple cylinder geometry made of 4 fuel assemblies, each made of 8x8 cylinders, corresponding to an experimental facility available at CEA. The comparison between numerical results and experiments show good agreement. The model can correctly predict the added mass. It can also qualitatively capture the coupling between assemblies and the effect of confinement. This shows that a potential flow approach can give insight into the complex fluid-structure interactions within a nuclear reactor and, in particular, be used to predict the response to seismic forcing at low computational cost.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.