Paper detail

SeeSite: Efficiently Finding Co-occurring Splice Sites and Exon Splicing Enhancers

The problem of identifying splice sites consists of two sub-problems: finding their boundaries, and characterizing their sequence markers. Other splicing elements---including, enhancers and silencers---that occur in the intronic and exonic regions play an important role in splicing activity. Existing methods for detecting splicing elements are limited to finding either splice sites or enhancers and silencers, even though these elements are well-known to co-occur. We introduce SeeSite, an efficient and accurate tool for detecting splice sites and their complementary exon splicing enhancers (ESEs). SeeSite has three stages: graph construction, finding dense subgraphs, and recovering splice sites and ESEs along with their consensus. The third step involves solving Consensus Sequence with Outliers, an NP-complete string clustering problem. We prove that our algorithm for this problem outputs near-optimal solutions in polynomial time. Using SeeSite we demonstrate that ESEs are preferentially associated with weaker splice sites, and splice sites of a certain canonical form co-occur with specific ESEs.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.