Paper detail

Seeds of Life in Space (SOLIS). XIII. Nitrogen fractionation towards the protocluster OMC-2 FIR4

Isotopic fractionation is an important tool to investigate the chemical history of our Solar System (SS). In particular, the isotopic fraction of nitrogen (14N/15N) is lower in comets and other pristine SS bodies with respect to the value measured for the protosolar nebula, suggesting a local chemical enrichment of 15N during the SS formation. Therefore, interferometric studies of nitrogen fractionation in SS precursors are imperative for us to obtain clues about our astrochemical origins. In this work, we investigated the variation of the 14N/15N ratio in one of the closest analogues of the environment in which the SS was born: the protocluster OMC-2 FIR4. We present the first comparison at high angular resolution between HCN and N2H+ using interferometric data. We analysed observations of the HCN isotopologues H13CN and HC15N in the OMC-2 FIR4 protocluster, specifically the transitions H13CN (1-0) and HC15N (1-0), from NOEMA within the context of the IRAM Seeds Of Life In Space Large Program. We combined our results with analysis of archival data obtained with ALMA of N2H+ and its 15N isotopologues. Our results show a small regional variation in the ratio for HCN from ~250 to 500. The ratios in the central regions of FIR4, where the candidate protostars are located, are largely consistent (~300). They also show little variation from the part of the protocluster known to harbour a high cosmic-ray ionisation rate, to the portion with lower rate. We also found a small variation in the ratio of N2H+ across different regions from ~200 to ~400. These results suggest that local changes in the physical parameters occurring on small linear scales probed by our observations do not seem to affect the 14N/15N ratio in either HCN or N2H+ and hence that this is independent of the molecule used. Moreover, the high level of irradiation due to cosmic rays does not affect the N-fractionation either.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access11 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.