Paper detail

SEDAT:Security Enhanced Device Attestation with TPM2.0

Remote attestation is one of the ways to verify the state of an untrusted device. Earlier research has attempted remote verification of a devices' state using hardware, software, or hybrid approaches. Majority of them have used Attestation Key as a hardware root of trust, which does not detect hardware modification or counterfeit issues. In addition, they do not have a secure communication channel between verifier and prover, which makes them susceptible to modern security attacks. This paper presents SEDAT, a novel methodology for remote attestation of the device via a security enhanced communication channel. SEDAT performs hardware, firmware, and software attestation. SEDAT enhances the communication protocol security between verifier and prover by using the Single Packet Authorization (SPA) technique, which provides replay and Denial of Service (DoS) protection. SEDAT provides a way for verifier to get on-demand device integrity and authenticity status via a secure channel. It also enables the verifier to detect counterfeit hardware, change in firmware, and software code on the device. SEDAT validates the manufacturers` root CA certificate, platform certificate, endorsement certificate (EK), and attributes certificates to perform platform hardware attestation. SEDAT is the first known tool that represents firmware, and Integrity Measurement Authority (IMA) event logs in the Canonical Event Logs (CEL) format (recommended by Trusted Computing Group). SEDAT is the first implementation, to the best of our knowledge, that showcases end to end hardware, firmware, and software remote attestation using Trusted Platform Module (TPM2.0) which is resilient to DoS and replay attacks. SEDAT is the first remote verifier that is capable of retrieving a TPM2.0 quote from prover and validate it after regeneration, using a software TPM2.0 quote check.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.