Paper detail

Security and Privacy in Cache-Aided Linear Function Retrieval for Multi-access Coded Caching

A multi-access network consisting of $N$ files, $C$ caches, $K$ users with each user having access to a unique set of $r$ caches has been introduced recently by Muralidhar et al. ("Maddah-Ali-Niesen Scheme for Multi-access Coded Caching," in \textit{Proc. ITW}, 2021). It considers Single File Retrieval (SFR) i.e, each user demands an arbitrary file from the server. It proposes a coded caching scheme which was shown to be optimal under the assumption of uncoded placement by Brunero and Elia ("Fundamental Limits of Combinatorial Multi-Access Caching" in {\textit{arXiv:2110.07426} }). The above multi-access network is referred to as combinatorial topology which is considered in this work with three additional features : a) Linear Function Retrieval (LFR) i.e., each user is interested in retrieving an arbitrary linear combination of files in the server's library; b) Security i.e., the content of the library must be kept secure from an eavesdropper who obtains the signal sent by the server; c) Privacy i.e., each user can only get its required file and can not get any information about the demands of other users. Achievable Secure, Private LFR (SP-LFR) scheme, Secure LFR (S-LFR) scheme and Improved S-LFR scheme are proposed. As special cases, our work recovers some of the results by Yan and Tuninetti ("Key Superposition Simultaneously Achieves Security and Privacy in Cache-Aided Linear Function Retrieval," in \textit{Trans. Inf. Forensics and Security}, 2021") and Sengupta et al.("Fundamental limits of caching with secure delivery," in \textit{Trans. Inf. Forensics and Security}, 2015). At a memory point, $M=\frac{r\binom{C}{r}}{C}$, the SP-LFR scheme is within a constant multiplicative factor from the optimal rate for $N\geq2Kr$ and at, $M=\frac{\binom{C}{r}}{C}$, the improved S-LFR scheme is within a constant multiplicative factor from the optimal rate for $N\geq2K$.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.