Paper detail

Secure Source Coding with a Helper

We consider a secure source coding problem with a rate-limited helper. In particular, Alice observes an independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) source X and wishes to transmit this source losslessly to Bob over a rate-limited link. A helper (Helen), observes an i.i.d. correlated source Y and can transmit information to Bob over a separate rate-limited link. A passive eavesdropper (Eve) can observe the coded output of Alice, i.e., the link from Alice to Bob is public. The uncertainty about the source X at Eve, is measured by the conditional entropy of the source given the coded output of Alice. We completely characterize the rate-equivocation region for this secure source coding model, where we show that Slepian-Wolf binning of X with respect to the coded side information received at Bob is optimal. We next consider a modification of this model in which Alice also has access to the coded output of Helen. For the two-sided helper model, we characterize the rate-equivocation region. While the availability of side information at Alice does not reduce the rate of transmission from Alice, it significantly enhances the resulting equivocation at Eve. In particular, the resulting equivocation for the two-sided helper case is shown to be min(H(X),R_y), i.e., one bit from the two-sided helper provides one bit of uncertainty at Eve. From this result, we infer that Slepian-Wolf binning of X is suboptimal and one can further decrease the information leakage to the eavesdropper by utilizing the side information at Alice. We finally generalize these results to the case in which there is additional un-coded side information W available at Bob and characterize the rate-equivocation regions under the assumption that Y-X-W forms a Markov chain.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.