Paper detail

Secure Information Flow by Model Checking Pushdown System

We propose an approach on model checking information flow for imperative language with procedures. We characterize our model with pushdown system, which has a stack of unbounded length that naturally models the execution of procedural programs. Because the type-based static analysis is sometimes too conservative and rejects safe program as ill-typed, we take a semantic-based approach by self-composing symbolic pushdown system and specifying noninterference with LTL formula. Then we verify this LTL-expressed property via model checker Moped. Except for overcoming the conservative characteristic of type-based approach, our motivation also includes the insufficient state of arts on precise information flow analysis under inter-procedural setting. To remedy the inefficiency of model checking compared with type system, we propose both compact form and contracted form of self-composition. According to our experimental results, they can greatly increase the efficiency of realistic verification. Our method provides flexibility on separating program abstraction from noninterference verification, thus could be expected to use on different programming languages.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.