Paper detail

Secure and scalable match: overcoming the universal circuit bottleneck using group programs

Confidential Content-Based Publish/Subscribe (C-CBPS) is an interaction (pub/sub) model that allows parties to exchange data while still protecting their security and privacy interests. In this paper we advance the state of the art in C-CBPS by showing how all predicate circuits in NC1 (logarithmic-depth, bounded fan-in) can be securely computed by a broker while guaranteeing perfect information-theoretic security. Previous work could handle only strictly shallower circuits (e.g. those with depth O(\sqrt{\lg n}) [SYY99, V76]. We present three protocols -- UGP-Match, FSGP-Match and OFSGP-Match -- all three are based on (2-decomposable randomized encodings of) group programs and handle circuits in NC1. UGP-Match is conceptually simple and has a clean proof of correctness but it is inefficient and impractical. FSGP-Match uses a "fixed structure" trick to achieve efficiency and scalability. And, finally, OFSGP-Match uses hand-optimized group programs to wring greater efficiencies. We complete our investigation with an experimental evaluation of a prototype implementation.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.