Paper detail

Secular evolution and a non-evolving black hole to galaxy mass ratio in the last 7 Gyr

We present new constraints on the ratio of black hole (BH) mass to total galaxy stellar mass at 0.3<z<0.9 for a sample of 32 type-1 active galactic nuclei (AGNs) from the XMM-COSMOS survey covering the range M_BH/M_sun~10^(7.2--8.7). Virial M_BH estimates based on H_beta are available from the COSMOS Magellan/IMACS survey. We use high-resolution Hubble Space Telescope (HST) imaging to decompose the light of each type-1 AGN and host galaxy, and employ a specially-built mass-to-light ratio to estimate the stellar masses (M_*). The M_BH-M_* ratio shows a zero offset with respect to the local relation for galactic bulge masses, and we also find no evolution in the mass ratio M_BH/M_*=(1+z)^{0.02+-0.34} up to z~0.9. Interestingly, at the high-M_BH end there is a positive offset from the z=0 relation, which can be fully explained by a mass function bias with a cosmic scatter of 0.3, reaffirming that the intrinsic distribution is consistent with zero evolution. From our results we conclude that since z~0.9 no substantial addition of stellar mass is required: the decline in star formation rates and merger activity at z<1 support this scenario. Nevertheless, given that a significant fraction of these galaxies show a disk component, their bulges are indeed undermassive. This is a direct indication that for the last 7 Gyr the only essential mechanism required in order that these galaxies obey the z=0 relation is a redistribution of stellar mass to the bulge, likely driven by secular processes, i.e., internal instabilities and minor merging.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access9 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.