Paper detail

Sectorial equidistribution of the roots of $x^2 + 1$ modulo primes

The equation $x^2 + 1 = 0\mod p$ has solutions whenever $p = 2$ or $4n + 1$. A famous theorem of Fermat says that these primes are exactly the ones that can be described as a sum of two squares. That the roots of the former equation are equidistributed is a beautiful theorem of Duke, Friedlander and Iwaniec from 1995. We show that a subsequence of the roots of the equation remains equidistributed even when one adds a restriction on the primes which has to do with the angle in the plane formed by their corresponding representation as a sum of squares. Similar to Duke, Friedlander and Iwaniec, we reduce the problem to the study of certain Poincare series, however, while their Poincare series were functions on an arithmetic quotient of the upper half plane, our Poincare series are functions on arithmetic quotients of $SL_2(\mathbb{R})$, as they have a nontrivial dependence on their Iwasawa $θ$-coordinate. Spectral analysis on these higher dimensional varieties involves the nonspherical spectrum, which posed a few new challenges. A couple of notable ones were that of obtaining pointwise bounds for nonspherical Eisenstein series and utilizing a non-spherical analogue of the Selberg inversion formula.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.