Paper detail

Secrecy Rate Study in Two-Hop Relay Channel with Finite Constellations

Two-hop security communication with an eavesdropper in wireless environment is a hot research direction. The basic idea is that the destination, simultaneously with the source, sends a jamming signal to interfere the eavesdropper near to or co-located with the relay. Similar as physical layer network coding, the friendly jamming signal will prevent the eavesdropper from detecting the useful information originated from the source and will not affect the destination on detecting the source information with the presence of the known jamming signal. However, existing investigations are confined to Gaussian distributed signals, which are seldom used in real systems. When finite constellation signals are applied, the behavior of the secrecy rate becomes very different. For example, the secrecy rate depends on phase difference between the input signals with finite constellations, which is not observed with Gaussian signals. In this paper, we investigate the secrecy capacity and derive its upper bound for the two-hop relay model, by assuming an eavesdropper near the relay and the widely used M-PSK modulation. With our upper bound, the best and worst phase differences in high SNR region are then given. Numerical studies verify our analysis and show that the derived upper bound is relatively tight.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.