Paper detail

Second order theory of $(j,0)\oplus (0,j)$ single high spins as Lorentz tensors

We show that higher order differential equations and matrix spinor calculus are completely avoidable in the description of pure high spin-$j$ Weinberg-Joos states, $(j,0)\oplus (0,j)$. The case is made on the example of $(3/2,0)\oplus(0,3/2)$, for the sake of concreteness and without loss of generality. Namely, we use as a vehicle for the aforementioned covariant single spin-$3/2$ description the antisymmetric tensor of second rank with Dirac spinor components, $Ψ_{[μν]}=B_{[μν]}\otimesψ$. The $(3/2,0)\oplus(0,3/2)$ sector of interest is tracked down in two steps. First we search for spin-$3/2$ by means of a covariant spin projector constructed from the Casimir invariants of the Poincaré algebra, and then we identify the wanted irreducible representation space by means of a momentum independent (static) projector designed on the basis of the Casimir invariants of the Lorentz algebra. The latter projectors unambiguously identify any irreducible $so(1,3)$ subspace of any Lorentz tensor and without rising the order of the differential equation. The method proposed correctly reproduces the electromagnetic multipole moments earlier calculated for single spin-$3/2$ particles in treating it in the standard way as eight dimensional spinor. We furthermore calculate Compton scattering off the pure spin-$3/2$ under discussion, and show that the differential cross section satisfies unitarity in forward direction for a gyromagnetic ratio of $g=2/3$. Suggesting possible validity of Belinfante's conjecture for pure spin-states, while the natural value of $g=2$ seems more likely to characterize the highest spins in the Rarita-Schwinger representation spaces. The scheme straightforwardly extends to any $(j,0)\oplus (0,j)$ Weinberg-Joos state and brings the advantage of avoiding rectangular matrix couplings between states of different spins, replacing them by simple Lorentz contractions.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.