Paper detail

Second cohomology groups for algebraic groups and their Frobenius kernels

Let $G$ be a simple simply connected algebraic group scheme defined over an algebraically closed field of characteristic $p > 0$. Let $T$ be a maximal split torus in $G$, $B \supset T$ be a Borel subgroup of $G$ and $U$ its unipotent radical. Let $F: G \rightarrow G$ be the Frobenius morphism. For $r \geq 1$ define the Frobenius kernel, $G_r$, to be the kernel of $F$ iterated with itself $r$ times. Define $U_r$ (respectively $B_r$) to be the kernel of the Frobenius map restricted to $U$ (respectively $B$). Let $X(T)$ be the integral weight lattice and $X(T)_+$ be the dominant integral weights. The computations of particular importance are $\h^2(U_1,k)$, $\h^2(B_r,\la)$ for $\la \in X(T)$, $\h^2(G_r,H^0(\la))$ for $\la \in X(T)_+$, and $\h^2(B,\la)$ for $\la \in X(T)$. The above cohomology groups for the case when the field has characteristic 2 one computed in this paper. These computations complete the picture started by Bendel, Nakano, and Pillen for $p \geq 3$ \cite{BNP2}.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.