Paper detail

Seasonal Variations in Relative Weight of Lake Trout (Salvelinus namaycush), Kokanee Salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka), Rainbow Trout (Onocorhynchus mykiss), and Brown Trout (Salmo trutta) in Blue Mesa Reservoir, Colorado

Blue Mesa Reservoir is the largest body of water in Colorado and is located on the western slope of the Rocky Mountains at an elevation of 7520 feet. Blue Mesa Reservoir contains recreationally important populations of lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush), kokanee salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka), rainbow trout (Onocorhynchus mykiss), and brown trout (Salmo trutta). A management challenge in recent years has been the overpopulation of lake trout, which has led to a steep decline in abundance of kokanee salmon (a preferred food source) followed by a steep decline in body condition of the lake trout. Relative weight, Wr, is commonly used to assess body condition and prey availability of fish in a variety of ecosystems, but its seasonal variability has not been well documented in cold water species. Relative weight is 100 times the actual weight of a fish divided by expected weight (or standard weight) of that species at the measured total length. The present study uses multi-year, multi-season length and weight data provided by the Colorado Department of Parks and Wildlife to quantify seasonal variations in mean relative weight in these four species. It is found that lake trout consistently lose significant body condition between the spring and the fall of a given year, with a mean loss in relative weight of 11.7 +/- 2.4. In contrast, kokanee salmon tend to gain significant body condition between spring and fall with a mean gain in relative weight of 5.2 +/- 2.9. Rainbow trout tend to lose body condition between summer and fall with a mean loss of relative weight of 7.4 +/- 1.7. Brown trout tend to gain body condition between spring and fall with a mean gain of 5.6 +/- 1.8. These findings can be interpreted in terms of the feeding habits, forage availability, and metabolic activity of each species.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.