Paper detail

Searching for the Origin of CP violation in Cabibbo Suppressed D-meson Decays

The recent evidence of large direct CP violation in D0 decay at LHCb suggests that such CP studies may become an important avenue for understanding CP. In this paper, we make several suggestions to try to clarify the role of new physics in these results. We propose that the enhancement needed in the Standard Model to attribute the observed CP violation in D to two pseudoscalar modes may not operate for inclusive final states where asymmetries will likely approximate the quark level expectation. Experimentally testing this principle requires a search for CP asymmetries in final states containing K and K-bar with a total energy of less than M_D. We also propose that CP asymmetries may be enhanced in modes where the tree is color suppressed. In particular, the final state rho0 rho0 is of special interest; similarly Ds-> rho0 K+ and rho0 K*+ likewise appear interesting. We discuss how isospin symmetry yields observables sensitive to certain classes of new physics and suppressed in the Standard Model. Some modes considered in this context are D-> pi pi, rho pi, rho rho as well as Ds-> K* pi. We also consider how such analysis may eventually be supplemented by information about the weak phases in D0 decay. In order to obtain this information experimentally, we consider various methods for preparing an initial state which is a quantum mechanical mixture of D0 and D0-bar. This may be done through the use of natural D0 D0-bar oscillations; observing D0-mesons which arise from Bd or Bs mesons which themselves are oscillating or from quantum correlations in D0 pairs which arise from either psi" decay or B-meson decay. Observing CP violation in the magnitudes of decay amplitudes should be within the capability of experiments in the near future however obtaining the weak phases through the methods we discuss will likely require future generations of machines.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.