Paper detail

Searching for Strange Quark Matter Objects Among White Dwarfs

The ground state of matter may be strange quark matter (SQM), not hadronic matter. A whole sequence of SQM objects, ranging from strange quark stars and strange quark dwarfs to strange quark planets, can stably exist according to this SQM hypothesis. A strange dwarf has a mass similar to that of a normal white dwarf but could harbor an extremely dense SQM core (with a density as large as $\sim \rm 4\times10^{14}\,g\,cm^{-3} $) at the center so that its radius can be correspondingly smaller. In this study, we try to search for strange dwarfs among the observed "white dwarfs" by considering their difference in the mass-radius relation. Seven strange dwarf candidates are identified in this way, whose masses are in the range of $\sim 0.02$ -- $0.12 M_{\odot}$, with the radii narrowly distributed in $\sim$ 9,000 -- 15,000 km. The seven objects are LSPM J0815+1633, LP 240-30, BD+20 5125B, LP 462-12, WD J1257+5428, 2MASS J13453297+4200437, and SDSS J085557.46+053524.5. Compared with white dwarfs of similar mass, these candidates are obviously smaller in radius. Further observations with large radio/infrared/optical telescopes on these interesting candidates are solicited.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.