Paper detail

Searching for Stars in Compact High-Velocity Clouds. I First Results from VLT and 2MASS

We investigate the hypothesis that compact high-velocity clouds (CHVC) are the "missing" dwarf galaxies of the Local Group, by searching them for populations of resolved stars. To this end we conducted two distinct tests based on optical and near-infrared single-star photometry. The optical and the near-infrared experiments complement one another; the optical data help us to rule out distant populations but they are restricted to the central regions of the gas distributions, whereas the near-infrared photometry allows us to set limits on nearby populations spread over the typical cloud size. First, we discuss deep optical single-star photometry of five CHVCs in the V and I filters, obtained with the FORS instrument at the Very Large Telecope (VLT). We find that their optical colour-magnitude diagrams are indistinguishable from that of a population of Galactic stars, and attribute all of the resolved stars to Galactic foreground. We present simulations which address the question of how much of a "normal" dwarf-galaxy type population we might hide in the data. A Kolmogorov-Smirnov test allows us to set very stringent limits on the absence of a resolved stellar population in CHVCs. Second, we also culled near infrared single-star photometry in the J, H, and K_S bands for four of the CHVCs from the Two Micron All Sky Survey (2MASS). The infrared data do not reveal any stellar contents in the CHVCs which resembles that of nearby dwarf galaxies either, and are explained with Galactic foreground as well. We interpret our null detections to indicate that the five CHVCs investigated by us do not host an associated stellar content which is similar to that of the known dwarf galaxies of the Local Group. These CHVCs are very likely pure hydrogen clouds in which no star formation has taken place over cosmic time.

preprint2002arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.