Paper detail

Searching for $γ$-Ray Pulsars among Fermi Unassociated Sources: 2FGL J1906.5+0720

We report the results from our analysis of the \textit{Fermi} Large Area Telescope data of the \textit{Fermi} unassociated source 2FGL J1906.5$+$0720, which is a high-ranked candidate pulsar. In order to better study our target, we first update the ephemeris for PSR J1907$+$0602, which is used to help remove any possible contamination due to strong emission from this nearby pulsar. From our analysis, 2FGL J1906.5$+$0720 is confirmed to have a significant low energy cutoff at $\sim$ 1~GeV in its emission (14$σ$--18$σ$ significance), consistent with those seen in young pulsars. We search for pulsations but no spin frequency signals are found in a frequency range of 0.5--32 Hz. No single model can fully describe the source's overall \fermi\ $γ$-ray spectrum, and the reason for this is the excess emission detected at energies of $\geq$4 GeV. The high-energy component possibly indicates emission from a pulsar wind nebula, when considering 2FGL J1906.5$+$0720 as a young pulsar. We conclude that 2FGL J1906.5$+$0720 is likely a pulsar based on the emission properties we have obtained, and observations at other energies are needed in order to confirm its pulsar nature.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.