Paper detail

Searching for new observational signatures of the dynamical evolution of star clusters

We present a numerical study, based on Monte Carlo simulations, aimed at defining new empirical parameters measurable from observations and able to trace the different phases of star cluster dynamical evolution. As expected, a central density cusp, deviating from the King model profile, develops during the core collapse (CC) event. Although the slope varies during the post-CC oscillations, the cusp remains a stable feature characterizing the central portion of the density profile in all post-CC stages. We then investigate the normalized cumulative radial distribution (nCRD) drawn by all the cluster stars included within one half the tridimensional half-mass radius (R<0.5 rh), finding that its morphology varies in time according to the cluster's dynamical stage. To quantify these changes we defined three parameters: A5, the area subtended by the nCRD within 5% of the half-mass radius, P5, the value of the nCRD measured at the same distance, and S2.5, the slope of the straight line tangent to the nCRD measured at R=2.5% rh. The three parameters evolve similarly during the cluster's dynamical evolution: after an early phase in which they are essentially constant, their values rapidly increase, reaching their maximum at the CC epoch and slightly decreasing in the post-CC phase, when their average value remains significantly larger than the initial one, in spite of some fluctuations. The results presented in the paper suggest that these three observable parameters are very promising empirical tools to identify the star cluster's dynamical stage from observational data.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.