Paper detail

Searching for massive galaxies at z>=3.5 in GOODS-North

We constrain the space density and properties of massive galaxy candidates at redshifts of z>=3.5 in the GOODS-N field. By selecting sources in the Spitzer+IRAC bands, a highly stellar mass-complete sample is assembled,including massive galaxies which are very faint in the optical/near-IR bands that would be missed by samples selected at shorter wavelengths. The z>=3.5 sample was selected down to 23 mag at 4.5 micron using photometric redshifts that have been obtained by fitting the galaxies SEDs at optical, near-IR and IRAC bands. We also require that the brightest band in which candidates are detected is the IRAC 8 micron band in order to ensure that the near-IR 1.6 micron (rest-frame) peak is falling in or beyond this band. We found 53 z>=3.5 candidates, with masses in the range of M~10^10-10^11M_sun. At least ~81% of these galaxies are missed by traditional Lyman Break selection methods based on UV light. Spitzer+MIPS emission is detected for 60% of the sample of z>=3.5 galaxy candidates. Although in some cases this might suggest a residual contamination from lower redshift star-forming galaxies or AGN, 37% of these objects are also detected in the sub-mm/mm bands in recent SCUBA,AzTEC and MAMBO surveys, and have properties fully consistent with vigorous starburst galaxies at z>=3.5. The comoving number density of galaxies with stellar masses >= 5x10^10M_sun(a reasonable stellar mass completeness limit for our sample) is 2.6x10^-5Mpc^-3 (using the volume within 3.5<z<5), and the corresponding stellar mass density is ~2.9x10^6M_sunMpc^-3, or~3% of the local density above the same stellar mass limit.For the sub-sample of MIPS-undetected galaxies,we find a number density of ~0.97x10^-5Mpc^-3 and a stellar mass density of ~1.15x10^6M_sun Mpc^-3.[abridged]

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.