Paper detail

Searching for evidence of jet-cloud interaction in radio galaxies. First results for 3C 381

We present results of Gemini spectroscopy and Hubble Space Telescope imaging of the 3C~381 radio galaxy. Possible ionising mechanisms for the Extended Emission-Line Region were studied through state-of-the-art diagnostic analysis employing line-ratios. Photoionisation from the central engine as well as mixed-medium photoionisation models fail in reproducing both the strengths and the behaviour of the highest-excitation lines, such as [NeV]3424, HeII, and [OIII}]5007, which are measured at very large distances from the AGN. Shock-ionisation models provide a better fit to the observation. Expanding shocks with velocities higher than 500 km/s are capable of reaching the observed intensity ratios for lines with different ionisation states and excitation degrees. This model also provide a direct explanation of the mechanical energy input needed to explain the high-velocity line-splitting observed in the velocity field.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.