Paper detail

Searching for a subpopulation of primordial black holes in LIGO/Virgo gravitational-wave data

With several dozen binary black hole events detected by LIGO/Virgo to date and many more expected in the next few years, gravitational-wave astronomy is shifting from individual-event analyses to population studies. Using the GWTC-2 catalog, we perform a hierarchical Bayesian analysis that for the first time combines several state-of-the-art astrophysical formation models with a population of primordial black holes (PBHs) and constrains the fraction of a putative subpopulation of PBHs in the data. We find that this fraction depends significantly on the set of assumed astrophysical models. While a primordial population is statistically favored against certain competitive astrophysical channels, such as globular clusters and nuclear stellar clusters, a dominant contribution from the stable-mass-transfer isolated formation channel drastically reduces the need for PBHs, except for explaining the rate of mass-gap events like GW190521. The tantalizing possibility that black holes formed after inflation are contributing to LIGO/Virgo observations could only be verified by further reducing uncertainties in astrophysical and primordial formation models, and it may ultimately be confirmed by third-generation interferometers.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access9 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.