Paper detail

Searches for the Neutral Higgs Bosons of the MSSM: Preliminary Combined Results Using LEP Data Collected at Energies up to 209 GeV

In the year 2000 the four LEP experiments collected data at centre-of-mass energies between 200 and 209 GeV, integrating approximately 870 pb-1 of luminosity, with about 510 pb-1 above 206 GeV. The LEP working group for Higgs boson searches has combined these data with data sets collected previously at lower energies. In representative scans of the parameters of the Minimal Supersymmetric Standard Model (MSSM), the mass limits mh>91.0 GeV and mA>91.9 GeV are obtained for the light CP-even and the CP-odd neutral Higgs boson, respectively. For a top quark mass less than or equal to 174.3 GeV, assuming that the stop quark mixing is maximal, and choosing conservative values for other SUSY parameters affecting the Higgs sector, the range 0.5<tanbeta<2.4 is excluded. Additionally, the results of flavour-independent searches for hadronically decaying Higgs bosons are included, allowing exclusion of MSSM models with suppressed decays of the Higgs bosons to pairs of b quarks.

preprint2001arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.