Paper detail

Searches for Dark Matter annihilation signatures in the Segue 1 satellite galaxy with the MAGIC-I telescope

We report the results of the observation of the nearby satellite galaxy Segue 1 performed by the MAGIC-I ground-based gamma-ray telescope between November 2008 and March 2009 for a total of 43.2 hours. No significant gamma-ray emission was found above the background. Differential upper limits on the gamma-ray flux are derived assuming various power-law slopes for the possible emission spectrum. Integral upper limits are also calculated for several power-law spectra and for different energy thresholds. The values are of the order of 10^{-11} ph cm^{-2}$ s^{-1} above 100 GeV and 10^{-12} ph cm^{-2} s^{-1} above 200 GeV. Segue 1 is currently considered one of the most interesting targets for indirect dark matter searches. In these terms, the upper limits have been also interpreted in the context of annihilating dark matter particles. For such purpose, we performed a grid scan over a reasonable portion of the parameter space for the minimal SuperGravity model and computed the flux upper limit for each point separately, taking fully into account the peculiar spectral features of each model. We found that in order to match the experimental upper limits with the model predictions, a minimum flux boost of 10^{3} is required, and that the upper limits are quite dependent on the shape of the gamma-ray energy spectrum predicted by each specific model. Finally we compared the upper limits with the predictions of some dark matter models able to explain the PAMELA rise in the positron ratio, finding that Segue 1 data are in tension with the dark matter explanation of the PAMELA spectrum in the case of a dark matter candidate annihilating into tau+tau-. A complete exclusion however is not possible due to the uncertainties in the Segue 1 astrophysical factor.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
The MAGIC CollaborationJ. AleksićE. A. AlvarezL. A. AntonelliP. AntoranzM. AsensioM. BackesJ. A. BarrioD. BastieriJ. Becerra GonzálezW. BednarekA. BerdyuginK. BergerE. BernardiniA. BilandO. BlanchR. K. BockA. BollerG. BonnoliD. Borla TridonI. BraunT. BretzA. CañellasE. CarmonaA. CarosiP. ColinE. ColomboJ. L. ContrerasJ. CortinaL. CossioS. CovinoF. DazziA. De AngelisE. De Cea del PozoB. De LottoC. Delgado MendezA. Diago OrtegaM. DoertA. DomínguezD. Dominis PresterD. DornerM. DoroD. ElsaesserD. FerencM. V. FonsecaL. FontC. FruckR. J. García LópezM. GarczarczykD. GarridoG. GiavittoN. GodinovićD. HadaschD. HäfnerA. HerreroD. HildebrandD. Höhne-MönchJ. HoseD. HrupecB. HuberT. JoglerS. KlepserT. KrähenbühlJ. KrauseA. La BarberaD. LelasE. LeonardoE. LindforsS. LombardiM. LópezE. LorenzM. MakarievG. ManevaN. MankuzhiyilK. MannheimL. MaraschiM. MariottiM. MartínezD. MazinM. MeucciJ. M. MirandaR. MirzoyanH. MiyamotoJ. MoldónA. MoralejoP. Munar-AdroverD. NietoK. NilssonR. OritoI. OyaS. PaianoD. PanequeR. PaolettiS. PardoJ. M. ParedesS. PartiniM. PasanenF. PaussM. A. Perez-TorresM. PersicL. PeruzzoM. PiliaJ. PochonF. PradaP. G. Prada MoroniE. PrandiniI. PuljakI. ReichardtR. ReinthalW. RhodeM. RibóJ. RicoS. RügamerA. SaggionK. SaitoT. Y. SaitoM. SalvatiK. SataleckaV. ScalzottoV. ScapinC. SchultzT. SchweizerM. ShaydukS. N. ShoreA. SillanpääJ. SitarekD. SobczynskaF. SpanierS. SpiroA. StamerraB. SteinkeJ. StorzN. StrahT. SurićL. TakaloH. TakamiF. TavecchioP. TemnikovT. TerzićD. TescaroM. TeshimaM. ThomO. TibollaD. F. TorresA. TrevesH. VankovP. VoglerR. M. WagnerQ. WeitzelV. ZabalzaF. ZandanelR. ZaninM. FornasaR. EssigN. SehgalL. E. Strigari

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access156 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

The MAGIC CollaborationJ. AleksićE. A. AlvarezL. A. AntonelliP. AntoranzM. AsensioM. BackesJ. A. BarrioD. BastieriJ. Becerra GonzálezW. BednarekA. BerdyuginK. BergerE. BernardiniA. BilandO. BlanchR. K. BockA. BollerG. BonnoliD. Borla TridonI. BraunT. BretzA. CañellasE. CarmonaA. CarosiP. ColinE. ColomboJ. L. ContrerasJ. CortinaL. CossioS. CovinoF. DazziA. De AngelisE. De Cea del PozoB. De LottoC. Delgado MendezA. Diago OrtegaM. DoertA. DomínguezD. Dominis PresterD. DornerM. DoroD. ElsaesserD. FerencM. V. FonsecaL. FontC. FruckR. J. García LópezM. GarczarczykD. GarridoG. GiavittoN. GodinovićD. HadaschD. HäfnerA. HerreroD. HildebrandD. Höhne-MönchJ. HoseD. HrupecB. HuberT. JoglerS. KlepserT. KrähenbühlJ. KrauseA. La BarberaD. LelasE. LeonardoE. LindforsS. LombardiM. LópezE. LorenzM. MakarievG. ManevaN. MankuzhiyilK. MannheimL. MaraschiM. MariottiM. MartínezD. MazinM. MeucciJ. M. MirandaR. MirzoyanH. MiyamotoJ. MoldónA. MoralejoP. Munar-AdroverD. NietoK. NilssonR. OritoI. OyaS. PaianoD. PanequeR. PaolettiS. PardoJ. M. ParedesS. PartiniM. PasanenF. PaussM. A. Perez-TorresM. PersicL. PeruzzoM. PiliaJ. PochonF. PradaP. G. Prada MoroniE. PrandiniI. PuljakI. ReichardtR. ReinthalW. RhodeM. RibóJ. RicoS. RügamerA. SaggionK. SaitoT. Y. SaitoM. SalvatiK. SataleckaV. ScalzottoV. ScapinC. SchultzT. SchweizerM. ShaydukS. N. ShoreA. SillanpääJ. SitarekD. SobczynskaF. SpanierS. SpiroA. StamerraB. SteinkeJ. StorzN. StrahT. SurićL. TakaloH. TakamiF. TavecchioP. TemnikovT. TerzićD. TescaroM. TeshimaM. ThomO. TibollaD. F. TorresA. TrevesH. VankovP. VoglerR. M. WagnerQ. WeitzelV. ZabalzaF. ZandanelR. ZaninM. FornasaR. EssigN. SehgalL. E. Strigari

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.