Paper detail

Search for the metal-weak thick disk from the LAMOST DR5

Based on the data release of the Large Sky Area Multi-Object Fiber Spectroscopic Telescope survey (LAMOST DR5) and the \emph{Gaia} Early Data Release 3 (\emph{Gaia} EDR3), we construct a sample containing 46,109 giant (log~$\emph{g}$ $\leqslant$ 3.5\,dex) stars with heliocentric distance d $\leqslant$ 4 kpc, and the sample is further divided into two groups of the inner ({\RGC} $<$ 8.34 \,kpc) and outer region ({\RGC} $>$ 8.34\,kpc). The {\LZ} distributions of our program stars in the panels with different [Fe/H] and [$α$/Fe] suggest that the thick-disk consists of two distinct components with different chemical compositions and kinematic properties. For the inner region, the metal-weak thick disk (MWTD) contributes significantly when [$α$/Fe] $>+$0.2\,dex and [Fe/H] $<-$0.8\,dex, while the canonical thick-disk (TD) dominates when [Fe/H]$>-$0.8\,dex. However, MWTD clearly appears only when [$α$/Fe] $>+$0.2\,dex and [Fe/H] $<-$1.2\,dex for the outer region, and its proportion is lower than that of the inner region within the same metallicity. Similar result can be obtained from the {\VP} distribution. The high fraction of MWTD in the inner than that in the outer region imply that MWTD may form in the inner disk, and is an observational evidence about the inside-out disk formation scenario.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.