Paper detail

Search for the host galaxy of GRB 050904 at z=6.3

We present the results of deep imaging of the field of GRB 050904 with Suprime-Cam on the Subaru 8.2m telescope. We have obtained a narrow-band (130 A) image centered at 9200 A (NB921) and an i'-band image with total integration times of 56700 and 24060 s, respectively. The host galaxy was not detected within 1'' of the afterglow position. An object was found at 1.5'' NE from the position of the afterglow, but clear detection of this object in the i'-band image rules out its association with the burst. We obtained a limit of > 26.4 AB magnitude (2'' diameter, 3 sigma) in the NB921 image for the host galaxy, corresponding to a flux of 6.0 x 10^{28} erg/s/Hz at rest 1500 A assuming a flat spectrum of the host galaxy. The star formation rate should be less than 7.5 (M_{solar}/yr) based on the conversion rate by Madau et al (1998). This upper limit for the host of GRB 050904 is consistent with the star formation rate of other gamma-ray burst host galaxies around redshift of 2 or less.

preprint2006arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.