Paper detail

Search for photon bubble oscillations in V0332+53

We report results of our search for fast oscillations in lightcurve of one of the brightest accretion powered pulsars on the sky V0332+53 with the help of data of the PCA spectrometer of the RXTE observatory. In course of this search we have carefully explored complications appearing if one uses only sub-bands of the total bandpass of the PCA spectrometer. We show that lightcurves collected in the soft sub-band of the PCA spectrometer contains an additional instrumental noise, lightcurves of harder sub-bands lack some fraction of the anticipated Poisson noise. We show that this noise is caused by a cross-talk of energy bands, which lasts up to ~200usec. One hypothesis is that these effects are caused by temporarily drop of the PCA detector gain after any occurred event due to slowly moving ions in the detector volume. In order to avoid this effect we searched for fast oscillations in flux of V0332+53 only in the total bandpass of the PCA spectrometer 2-60 keV. We have not detected any quasi-periodic oscillations in lightcurve of the source with an upper limit at the level of 0.5% in the Fourier frequency range 200-1500 Hz.

preprint2015arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.