Paper detail

Search for Missing Links Between Two Extreme Wind Speed Profiles : Dark Energy Accretion and Adiabatic Fluid Accretion

In recent past, the progresses in accretion studies onto relativistically gravitating central objects like a Schwarzschild singularity reveal that the accretion flow must be transonic. For such cases, the radial inward speed gradient can be written as a numerator by denominator form among which the later vanishes somewhere in between infinite distance from the attracter to the event horizon of the same. For sustainability of a physical solutions, the numerator should vanish at the same radial distance where denominator does vanish. From this point, we obtain a second degree first order differential equation of radial inward speed and hence we obtain two branches of flow, namely accretion and wind. For adiabatic accretion case, the wind curve is formed to be more or less parallel to the radial distance axis as we move far from the central object. For dark energy accretion, this curve is parallel to the radial velocity axis. Here we face a question. Why there is no fluid speed profiles in between these two extremities. While searching the reasons, we follow that dark energy, if treated as an accreting object, should stay around the central \emph{compact star} and hence will contaminate the metric which propertises the compact star. In this research work, we have proposed a model with a rotating black hole embedded in quintessence where quintessence equation of state and spin parameters of the black hole are regulatory factors of the model. The resulting accretion and wind curves are studied. The Effect of negative pressure of dark energy is found to get catalyzed by the entry of the spin of the black hole. We tally our results with observations of accretion or outflow phenomenon near to different quasars.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.