Paper detail

Search for missing $ψ(4S)$ in the $e^+e^-\to π^+π^-ψ(2S)$ process

A detailed analysis to find a missing $ψ(4S)$ is made by utilizing the recent precise mesurements of the cross section for the process $e^+e^-\to ψ(2S)π^+π^-$ by Belle. Assuming three resonances $Y(4360)$, $Y(4660)$, and $ψ(4S)$ to fit the data, we obtain the resonance parameters for $ψ(4S)$ as $m=4243$ MeV and $Γ=16 \pm 31$ MeV showing a narrow state as predicted before. A combined fit to the data $e^+ e^- \to ψ(2S) π^+ π^-, \ h_c π^+ π^-$, and $χ_{c0} ω$ is also performed to obtain the similar resonance parameters of $ψ(4S)$. The upper limit of the branching ratio is fitted to be $\mathcal{B}(ψ(4S)\toψ(2S)π^+π^-) < 3\times 10^{-3}$, which can be understood by hadronic loop contributions in reasonable parameters range. In addition, the ratios of the branching ratios of the $ψ(4S)$ dipion transition to the one of $ψ(4S)\toχ_{c0}ω$ are fitted, which can be further measured by BESIII and forthcoming BelleII to confirm the existence of $ψ(4S)$.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.