Paper detail

Search for Excited and Exotic Electrons in the e-gamma Decay Channel in p-pbar Collisions at sqrt(s) = 1.96 TeV

We present a search for excited and exotic electrons (e*) decaying to an electron and a photon, both with high transverse momentum. We use 202/pb of data collected in p-pbar collisions at sqrt(s) = 1.96 TeV with the CDF II detector. No signal above Standard Model expectation is seen for associated ee* production. We discuss the e* sensitivity in the parameter space of the excited electron mass M(e*) and the compositeness energy scale Lambda. In the contact interaction model, we exclude 132 < M(e*) < 879 GeV/c^2 for Lambda = M(e*) at 95% confidence level (C.L.). In the gauge-mediated model, we exclude 126 < M(e*) < 430 GeV/c^2 at 95% C.L. for the phenomenological coupling f/Lambda ~ 0.01/GeV.

preprint2005arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.