Paper detail

Search for $B_s \rightarrow μ^{+}μ^{-}$ and $B_d \rightarrow μ^{+}μ^{-}$ decays with the full CDF Run II data set

We report on a search for \bsmm\ and \bdmm\ decays using proton-antiproton collision data at $\sqrt{s}=1.96$ TeV corresponding to $10 \fb$ of integrated luminosity collected by the CDF detector at the Fermilab Tevatron collider. The observed number of \bd\ candidates is consistent with background-only expectations and yields an upper limit on the branching fraction of $\brbdmm < 4.6\times 10^{-9}$ at 95% confidence level. We observe an excess of \bs\ candidates. The probability that the background processes alone could produce such an excess or larger is 0.94%. The probability that the combination of background and the expected standard model rate of \bsmm\ could produce such an excess or larger is 6.8%. These data are used to determine a branching fraction $\brbsmm = (1.3^{+0.9}_{-0.7}) \times 10^{-8} $ and provide an upper limit of $\brbsmm < 3.1\times 10^{-8}$ at 95% confidence level.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.