Paper detail

SDSSJ001153.08-064739.2, a cataclysmic variable with an evolved donor in the period gap

Secondary stars in cataclysmic variables (CVs) follow a well defined period-density relation. Thus, canonical donor stars in CVs are generally low-mass stars of spectral type M. However, several CVs have been observed containing secondary stars which are too hot for their inferred masses. This particular configuration can be explained if the donor stars in these systems underwent significant nuclear evolution before they reached contact. In this paper we present SDSSJ001153.08-064739.2 as an additional example belonging to this peculiar type of CV and discuss in detail its evolutionary history. We perform spectroscopic and photometric observations and make use of available Catalina Real-Time Transient Survey photometry to measure the orbital period of SDSSJ001153.08-064739.2 as 2.4 hours and estimate the white dwarf (Mwd>0.65Msun) and donor star (0.21Msun<Mdon<0.45Msun) masses, the mass ratio (q = 0.32 +- 0.08), the orbital inclination (47 degrees < i < 70 degrees), derive an accurate orbital ephemeris (T0 = 2453383.578 + E x 0.10028081), and report the detection of an outburst. We show that SDSSJ001153.08-064739.2 is one of the most extreme cases in which the donor star is clearly too hot for its mass. SDSSJ001153.08-064739.2 is therefore not only a peculiar CV containing an evolved donor star but also an accreting CV within the period gap. Intriguingly, approximately half of the total currently-observed sample of these peculiar CVs are located in the period gap with nearly the same orbital period.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.