Paper detail

SDSS-IV MaNGA: Integral-field kinematics and stellar population of a sample of galaxies with counter-rotating stellar disks selected from about 4000 galaxies

We present the integral-field kinematics and stellar population properties of 64 galaxies (61 are Early-Type galaxies, ETGs) with Counter-Rotating stellar Disks (CRD) selected from about 4000 galaxies in the MaNGA survey, based on evidence of counter-rotation or two velocity dispersion peaks in the kinematic maps. For 17 CRDs, the counter-rotating components can also be separated spectroscopically. The frequency of CRDs in MaNGA is <5% for ellipticals, <3% for lenticulars and <1% for spirals (at 95% confidence level), consistent with previous estimates. We produced age and metallicity maps, and compared the stellar population properties to those of the general ETGs population. We found that CRDs have similar trends in age and metallicity to ETGs, but are less metallic at low masses, and show flatter age and steeper metallicity gradients, on average. A comparison of the velocity fields of the ionized gas and the stars reveals that in 33 cases the gas corotates with either the inner (15 cases) or outer (18 cases) stellar disk, in 9 cases it is misaligned. In most cases the gas corotates with the younger disk. Evidence of multimodality in the stellar population is found in 31 galaxies, while the 14 youngest and least massive galaxies show ongoing star formation; 14 galaxies, instead, exhibit unimodality, and are the oldest and most massive. As a general result, our work indicates that CRDs form primarily via gas accretion in retrograde rotation with respect to a pre-existing stellar disk.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.