Paper detail

Scyclone: High-Quality and Parallel-Data-Free Voice Conversion Using Spectrogram and Cycle-Consistent Adversarial Networks

This paper proposes Scyclone, a high-quality voice conversion (VC) technique without parallel data training. Scyclone improves speech naturalness and speaker similarity of the converted speech by introducing CycleGAN-based spectrogram conversion with a simplified WaveRNN-based vocoder. In Scyclone, a linear spectrogram is used as the conversion features instead of vocoder parameters, which avoids quality degradation due to extraction errors in fundamental frequency and voiced/unvoiced parameters. The spectrogram of source and target speakers are modeled by modified CycleGAN networks, and the waveform is reconstructed using the simplified WaveRNN with a single Gaussian probability density function. The subjective experiments with completely unpaired training data show that Scyclone is significantly better than CycleGAN-VC2, one of the existing state-of-the-art parallel-data-free VC techniques.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.