Sculpting the sub-Saturn Occurrence Rate via Atmospheric Mass Loss

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Abstract

The sub-Saturn (∼\sim4--8R⊕R_{\oplus}) occurrence rate rises with orbital period out to at least ∼\sim300 days. In this work we adopt and test the hypothesis that the decrease in their occurrence towards the star is a result of atmospheric mass loss, which can transform sub-Saturns into sub-Neptunes (≲\lesssim4R⊕R_{\oplus}) more efficiently at shorter periods. We show that under the mass loss hypothesis, the sub-Saturn occurrence rate can be leveraged to infer their underlying core mass function, and by extension that of gas giants. We determine that lognormal core mass functions peaked near ∼\sim10--20M⊕M_{\oplus} are compatible with the sub-Saturn period distribution, the distribution of observationally-inferred sub-Saturn cores, and gas accretion theories. Our theory predicts that close-in sub-Saturns should be ∼\sim50\% less common and ∼\sim30\% more massive around rapidly rotating stars; this should be directly testable for stars younger than ≲\lesssim500 Myr. We also predict that the sub-Jovian desert becomes less pronounced and opens up at smaller orbital periods around M stars compared to solar-type stars (∼\sim0.7 days vs.~∼\sim3 days). We demonstrate that exceptionally low-density sub-Saturns, "Super-Puffs", can survive intense hydrodynamic escape to the present day if they are born with even larger atmospheres than they currently harbor; in this picture, Kepler 223 d began with an envelope ∼\sim1.5×\times the mass of its core and is currently losing its envelope at a rate ∼\sim2×10−3M⊕ Myr−1\times 10^{-3}M_{\oplus}~\mathrm{Myr}^{-1}. If the predictions from our theory are confirmed by observations, the core mass function we predict can also serve to constrain core formation theories of gas-rich planets.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.