Paper detail

Scott processes

The Scott process of a relational structure $M$ is the sequence of sets of formulas given by the Scott analysis of $M$. We present axioms for the class of Scott processes of structures in a relational vocabulary $τ$, and use them to give a proof of an unpublished theorem of Leo Harrington from the 1970's, showing that a counterexample to Vaught's Conjecture has models of cofinally many Scott ranks below $ω_{2}$. Our approach also gives a theorem of Harnik and Makkai, showing that if there exists a counterexample to Vaught's Conjecture, then there is a counterexample whose uncountable models have the same $\mathcal{L}_{ω_{1}, ω}(τ)$-theory, and which has a model of Scott rank $ω_{1}$. Moreover, we show that if $ϕ$ is a sentence of $\mathcal{L}_{ω_{1}, ω}(τ)$ giving rise to a counterexample to Vaught's Conjecture, then for every limit ordinal $α$ greater than the quantifier depth of $ϕ$ and below $ω_{2}$, $ϕ$ has a model of Scott rank $α$.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.