Paper detail

Schlieren and BOS velocimetry of a round turbulent helium jet in air

Seedless velocimetry is gaining interest in many industrial and research applications. We report on a comparative study of time-resolved optical velocimetry using traditional, mirror-type knife-edge schlieren optics versus Background-Oriented Schlieren (BOS) of subsonic round turbulent helium jets in air at Red = 5,890 and 11,300. Digital images with 1024 pixels streamwise resolution (0 < x/d < 200) were captured at 6000 frames/s in large ensembles. Velocimetry was performed on these results by digital image correlation (DIC) using OpenPIV software, and by streak-schlieren analysis of x-t diagrams (kymography). Limited PIV data were also collected for verification of the schlieren velocimetry results. Both BOS and traditional schlieren show partial success in measuring the mean-flow helium jet self-similarity in terms of the 1/x decay of centerline velocity, Gaussian-shaped radial velocity profiles, and linear spreading rate of the jet. Visualized turbulent eddies, used as tracers in schlieren velocimetry, are observed to last longer than is necessary for this purpose in the present helium jets. Also, the measured convective velocity appears to be sufficiently robust to sum to the jet mean velocity in some of the results. Kymography yields better overall results than DIC, which we attribute to kymography's spatiotemporal "spectrum" of jet velocities, enabling the discrimination of fast eddies near the jet centerline from slower ones near the jet periphery. DIC and other analysis methods suffer from a path-averaging bias which negatively affects the results. The reduction of kymographic data for velocimetry was done manually and also by a Fourier-transform image-feature-orientation code, both yielding equivalent results.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.