Paper detail

Scheme dependence of two-loop HTLpt-resummed $\text{SYM}_{4,4}$ thermodynamics

The resummed thermodynamics of ${\cal N}=4$ supersymmetric Yang-Mills theory in four space-time dimensions ($\text{SYM}_{4,4}$) has been calculated previously to two loop order within hard thermal loop perturbation theory (HTLpt) using the canonical dimensional regularization (DRG) scheme. Herein, we revisit this calculation using the regularization by dimensional reduction (RDR) scheme. Since the RDR scheme manifestly preserves supersymmetry it is the preferred scheme, however, it is important to assess if and by how much the resummed perturbative results depend on the regularization scheme used. Comparing predictions for the scaled entropy obtained using the DRG and RDR schemes we find that for $λ\lesssim 6$ they are numerically very similar. We then compare the results obtained in both schemes with the strict perturbative result, which is accurate up to order $λ^2$, and a generalized Padé approximant constructed from the known large-$N_c$ weak- and strong-coupling expansions. Comparing the strict perturbative expansion of the two-loop HTLpt result with the perturbative expansion to order $λ^2$, we find that both the DRG and RDR HTLpt calculations result in the same scheme-independent predictions for the coefficients at order $λ$, $λ^{3/2}$, and $λ^2 \logλ$, however, at order $λ^2$ there is a residual regularization scheme dependence.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.